implied sexism
Jun. 2nd, 2009 10:59 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Double Standard -- Wash Post article
On paper, Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor resembles one of her would-be colleagues on the high court: Princeton undergrad, Yale Law School, an editor on the Yale Law Journal, experience as a prosecutor and years of service on the federal bench.
Yet Judge Sotomayor, President Obama's pick to replace retiring Justice David H. Souter, is not being compared by some conservatives to Princeton/Yale alum Samuel A. Alito Jr., widely acclaimed as smart and qualified when he was nominated. Instead, they are trying to peg her as "President Obama's Harriet Miers," after the nominee of President George W. Bush who took herself out of contention as conservatives savaged her reputation and raised doubts about whether she was smart enough for the job.
Why is that?
[...] Karl Rove implicitly questioned Judge Sotomayor's intelligence, saying in an interview with PBS host Charlie Rose that "I know lots of stupid people who went to Ivy League schools." No doubt, but would Mr. Rove have said the same thing in connection with Justice Alito?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-02 04:39 pm (UTC)Would we call a well-studied lawyer who regularly wears "Fuck this court" shirts to trials qualified?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-02 07:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-02 07:17 pm (UTC)The Republican Party in general seems to be opposed to Marbury with their "activist judges" crap, but Renquist, Scalia, Thomas and especially Roberts haven't been nearly as explicit about it as Alito has been.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-03 11:55 pm (UTC)Did Rove have his former boss in mind when he said that?