novapsyche: Sailor Moon rising into bright beams (Default)
[personal profile] novapsyche
Interesting post in [livejournal.com profile] feminist regarding Obama's use of the word "sweetie" in reference to a female reporter.

(Ever since I heard about this exchange, I've been troubled by it. I don't know how to reconcile it.)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] custardfairy.livejournal.com
I'm coming from this as someone who uses the term honey, sweetie, and darlin' a lot to refer to men and women. I don't believe the words themselves are inherently sexist, and yet I can't say that Obama choosing to use "sweetie" to address a female reporter was the wisest move he's ever made.

At the same time, his immediate apology and handling of the situation is something I applaud. I know I'm sexist, too. I am imperfect and I will continue to screw up even when I know better. I'm glad Obama has done his best to make amends because he could have just gone of the defensive and made excuses. He didn't.

I'm sure it won't be the last time he makes a mistake, or behaves in a manner that indicates he isn't always as aware or proactive as we might hope.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] timiathan.livejournal.com
You comment so I don't have to!

I'll just add that when we're facing 8 years of fascistic federalism, an imploding economy, and the greatest crises humanity has faced since the Industrial Revolution in the end of cheap oil and concurrent global warming -- I don't care to parse one of 50 million words these people have said on tape over the last 12 months.

He screwed up, maybe it hints at a part of himself he'd like to change, nobodies perfect, move on.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 06:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] novapsyche.livejournal.com
Well, I didn't initially bring it up on my journal--I just thought the discussion in [livejournal.com profile] feminist was interesting. There are many ways to view the incident.

I think part of the issue is that feminists are instructed that the very language people use continues to embed sexism into our culture, so we are tasked with calling people out whenever they transgress.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 06:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] timiathan.livejournal.com
Oh I don't disagree at all -- I'm glad someone called him out, and I'm glad he apologized and says it's something he's working to correct. You hit the nail on the head with this comment, though...that's the thing, sexism is so embedded in our culture, it's so subtle and so pervasive and so often ignored, that slip ups like these are inevitable. The important thing is that one recognizes when they do it and why they shouldn't. I think he has.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] custardfairy.livejournal.com
What you said. :)

I'm glad that you pointed it out, [livejournal.com profile] novapsyche. I read the discussion with much interest and see a lot of valid points being made on all sides.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-22 04:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] novapsyche.livejournal.com
*smile* I'm glad you enjoyed the discussion.

[livejournal.com profile] feminist is a closed community, but if you want to have posting privileges, you need only email one of the moderators.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 06:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] timiathan.livejournal.com
Furthermore, McCain calls his wife a cunt. Hillary Clinton intentionally makes a racist argument every time she says, "Obama can't win the general election." Neither of them confess or apologize. Given the options, Obama seems noble for acknowledging his flaws.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] novapsyche.livejournal.com
I had no idea of the McCain thing until you and [livejournal.com profile] fizzyland brought it up. That is just . . . sad (especially since he is still holding office).

Hillary Clinton intentionally makes a racist argument every time she says, "Obama can't win the general election."

Yes, and it disappoints me deeply to see so many people excuse her implications and/or refuse to see the inherent racism.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-21 08:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pgdudda.livejournal.com
I agree with the "inherent racism" bit -- but, just to play a bit of "Devil's Advocate":

Isn't it also expected that one would use every tactic possible to get rid of one's rival, including pointing out that racism - both explicit and subconscious - might very well prevent Obama from being elected?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-22 04:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] novapsyche.livejournal.com
Race was something that everyone acknowledged at the beginning of the campaign. However, I don't see why the argument "some parts of the country are racist will not vote for a black man" should be a winning one for Ms. Clinton. "I attract the supremecist vote." "I'm the right shade." It just doesn't fly. Also, it doesn't work within the construct of the platform of the Democratic Party (the Democratic paradigm, if you will).

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-22 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pgdudda.livejournal.com
Thank you for elucidating something I couldn't quite put my finger on.

Profile

novapsyche: Sailor Moon rising into bright beams (Default)
novapsyche

October 2014

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12 131415161718
192021 22 232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags