(no subject)
Feb. 10th, 2005 12:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Minister's rape comment sparks row--Yeah, so many women are willing to be raped.
White House reporter's credentials questioned--I was honestly taken aback when I witnessed during President Bush's press conference last month this man end a question saying Democrats were "divorced from reality." (Check out this link for a pic with Gannon/Guckert in an, um, alternative picture.)
Pain from a woman will hurt less: study
White House reporter's credentials questioned--I was honestly taken aback when I witnessed during President Bush's press conference last month this man end a question saying Democrats were "divorced from reality." (Check out this link for a pic with Gannon/Guckert in an, um, alternative picture.)
Pain from a woman will hurt less: study
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-10 06:10 pm (UTC)I wasn't taken aback - there's nothing that would surprise me at this point about the Bush Administration's attempt to buy news coverage.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-10 06:19 pm (UTC)Somehow, considering the man's looks, I can see a spoof on MadTV coming up in the future. He's a dead ringer for one of their regulars.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-10 06:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-10 10:54 pm (UTC)Umm, I'm not even sure what was MEANT by this comment. By definition, you can't rape the willing. It's axiomatic. Is that what he was saying, in a backwards way? I think I'm missing something here.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-10 11:23 pm (UTC)His comment was not, in and of itself, misogynistic.