someone's lying--under oath.
Apr. 13th, 2004 06:31 pmThe second [FBI] report quoted Pickard as saying he had briefed Ashcroft on terrorist threats in late June and July 2001 but the attorney general was not interested.
"After two such briefings, the attorney general told him he did not want to hear this information anymore," the report quoted Pickard as saying. Pickard himself repeated the charge in his testimony but Ashcroft vehemently denied it.
"Acting Director Pickard and I had more than two meetings. We had regular meetings," he said.
"Secondly I did never speak to him saying that I did not want to hear about terrorism. I care greatly about the safety and security of the American people and was very interested in terrorism, and specifically interrogated him about threats to the American people and domestic threats in particular."
Ashcroft at Center of Storm Over Sept. 11 Attacks
"After two such briefings, the attorney general told him he did not want to hear this information anymore," the report quoted Pickard as saying. Pickard himself repeated the charge in his testimony but Ashcroft vehemently denied it.
"Acting Director Pickard and I had more than two meetings. We had regular meetings," he said.
"Secondly I did never speak to him saying that I did not want to hear about terrorism. I care greatly about the safety and security of the American people and was very interested in terrorism, and specifically interrogated him about threats to the American people and domestic threats in particular."
Ashcroft at Center of Storm Over Sept. 11 Attacks
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-13 10:02 pm (UTC)Maybe Ashcroft is not lying exactly. Maybe he is just failing to omit a phrase like "as long as those attacks came from Iraq."
See, he could just be concealing information on the basis that the question was not specific enough.
(NO, I am not trying to defend his sorry ass. More making fun of the "beauracratese" language.)