(no subject)
Jan. 9th, 2010 04:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In AMC's broadcast of Blazing Saddles today, it silently censored racial and gender slurs. I clearly remember in late 2008 watching it and it wasn't edited out.
I'm not normally for censorship, but I'm heartened that I can watch cable TV in the afternoon without hearing what I consider obscenities.
Edit: Actually, upon further thought, I feel worse about the censorship. A film is a work of art, and it should be appreciated in total. I still don't want to hear slurs over live airwaves, as I so distinctly remember from two years ago.
I'm not normally for censorship, but I'm heartened that I can watch cable TV in the afternoon without hearing what I consider obscenities.
Edit: Actually, upon further thought, I feel worse about the censorship. A film is a work of art, and it should be appreciated in total. I still don't want to hear slurs over live airwaves, as I so distinctly remember from two years ago.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-09 10:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-10 07:44 pm (UTC)If you stop calling people names, you don't have to explain what the name used to mean. This is why the only manner in which I support the use of slurs is in academic treatises (a category under which our present discussion would fall), because then the context (or at the very least a historical framework) would be provided.
Not familiar with Blazing Sadles, but AMC....
Date: 2010-01-10 07:54 am (UTC)I'd rather watch a movie in its original form, even when it has horrifying things in it. We need to be reminded that we don't do these things anymore for a reason. It would be bad to repeat those mistakes.