(no subject)

[novapsyche]

NPR really angered me this morning. The interviewer asked Mike McConnell why the telecoms should receive immunity if they ran afoul of the law, and McConnell responded that the Senate Committee had actually found that the telecoms had broken no laws.

Where was the logical follow-up? Keith Olbermann noted on his telecast two days prior that if no laws were broken, why would the companies need immunity?

*growl* I will be penning an e-mail shortly (as soon as I find out the name of the interviewer).

By the way, last night Olbermann had a fantastic special comment about the FISA bill currently being fearmongered debated. He even used the F-word several times.