(no subject)
Aug. 17th, 2006 01:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
novapsycheJudge nixes warrantless surveillance -- This is why we have the ACLU
Washington Post's take
NY Times' take
As the Honorable Anna Diggs Taylor said in her decision, "Like Judge Walker in Hepting, this court recognizes that simply because a factual statement has been made public it does not necessarily follow that it is true." This dictum needs to resound far and wide.
Washington Post's take
NY Times' take
As the Honorable Anna Diggs Taylor said in her decision, "Like Judge Walker in Hepting, this court recognizes that simply because a factual statement has been made public it does not necessarily follow that it is true." This dictum needs to resound far and wide.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 08:33 pm (UTC)