I've figured it out.
Jul. 12th, 2006 11:42 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Today's Christians strive to be nice to people.
But Christ wanted his followers to be kind.
There is a world of difference.
(I know I'm generalizing. Let me say this is my perception of American Protestantism in the last five years or so.)
But Christ wanted his followers to be kind.
There is a world of difference.
(I know I'm generalizing. Let me say this is my perception of American Protestantism in the last five years or so.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 04:27 pm (UTC)what do you think is the difference?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 04:45 pm (UTC)Kind:
1. Of a friendly, generous, or warm-hearted nature.
2. Showing sympathy or understanding; charitable
3. Humane; considerate
4. Forbearing; tolerant
5. Generous; liberal
6. Agreeable; beneficial
Having or showing a tender, considerate, and helping nature.
--
I would say that one can be nice (courteous) to just about anyone, but for most people, you have to love someone to be kind to them. Therefore being nice is simply being civil, while being kind is helping people out and being considerate of their feelings.
Yes? No?
tmi
Date: 2006-07-12 05:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 06:08 pm (UTC)Kindness requires an identification with another. One cannot be kind to someone without empathy. However, you can be nice to someone you don't really care about.
The service industry's foundation is that of being nice to people. It's all about a show of pleasantness, even if that feeling isn't sincere. But service workers take an emotional toll from that. The cognitive dissonance becomes too much.
Intolerant Christianity should be an oxymoron. But it's possible if the Christian is nice--that is, if s/he hates the sin but loves the sinner.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 08:04 pm (UTC)