sidelong analysis
Dec. 16th, 2005 08:49 pmAfter glancing at
supergee's journal, I came across a term that led me to a page that describes our administration succinctly:
The Hawthorne Effect (Why it's spelled differently is not known to me)
So, with regards to the Bush adminstration, Cheney kept visiting the CIA when the administration was looking for intelligence on Iraq. The analysts eventually began giving Cheney what he was looking for (albeit in the weakest language as they could muster): the Hawthorn effect.
As far as the intelligence itself, Cheney et al. cherry-picked, talking up what looked good: the Rosenthal effect.
The Hawthorn Effect is where the participants or subjects in research projects, instead of acting naturally, try to please the researcher by giving her the results she is looking for. It is named after The GE corporation in Hawthorn, Ohio. It is also known as subject or response bias
Single blind control - is where the researcher or the participant does not know the purpose of the experiment. When the researcher is 'blind' this controls for the Rosenthal Effect or researcher bias; i.e. seeing what you want to see rather than what is there.
The Hawthorne Effect (Why it's spelled differently is not known to me)
So, with regards to the Bush adminstration, Cheney kept visiting the CIA when the administration was looking for intelligence on Iraq. The analysts eventually began giving Cheney what he was looking for (albeit in the weakest language as they could muster): the Hawthorn effect.
As far as the intelligence itself, Cheney et al. cherry-picked, talking up what looked good: the Rosenthal effect.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-17 02:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-17 02:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-17 01:13 pm (UTC)I'm adding you to my reading list.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 05:51 pm (UTC)