Another tack.
Oct. 1st, 2003 12:10 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
novapsycheThe absence of proof that chemical and biological weapons and their related development programs had been destroyed was considered as proof that they continued to exist.
This is supposed to be rational. Yet when Christians use this "logic" in regards to God (absence of proof considered as proof), atheists laugh and point.
This is supposed to be rational. Yet when Christians use this "logic" in regards to God (absence of proof considered as proof), atheists laugh and point.