(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-23 08:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laureth.livejournal.com
Back in the day, extended families with generations living together was the norm. Then, "prosperity" made things like suburbs, nuclear families, and the like. The article makes it sound like generations living together is a temporary thing until get "get back on our feet," so to speak, but I wonder if this arrangement will become more common and more permanent as the "prosperity" of the last 60 years fades back to the way we'd lived for time immemorial before that. As things crash around us, it seems inevitable that we'll backtrack, picking up the ways we used to live in the past, and adapt to them again.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-24 02:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jdoggiedogg.livejournal.com
Is it prosperity or the industrial revolution? Now that society is no longer self-sustaining agrarian, the extended family model might not be as functional since it doesn't lend itself to mobility. Not that the current situation is functional, but it's what we've got.

Profile

novapsyche: Sailor Moon rising into bright beams (Default)
novapsyche

October 2014

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12 131415161718
192021 22 232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags