(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-18 10:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sttatus-quo.livejournal.com
freeze: froze
Squeeze: not that either

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-18 10:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
That : those
hat : darn it. Try again!

Mouse : mice
House : oh fooey.

We'll come up with something sometime.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-18 10:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] o-lucky-man.livejournal.com
I think it does work. Smitten is the past participle of smite. Or am I missing something?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-18 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brendand.livejournal.com
Yes, but it has a different relative meaning to smite than does bitten to bite.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-18 11:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fadedpaladin.livejournal.com
drink:drank:drunk
think:thank:thunk....
...mink:mank:monk...
smite:smat:smut?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-19 12:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pgdudda.livejournal.com
Actually, the paradigm for smite is smite>smote>smote>smitten -- cf. write>wrote>wrote>written

Not that I'm being picky or anything... ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-19 01:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fadedpaladin.livejournal.com
Bite>bote>boat>bitten? *impish grin*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-19 02:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] droid-1.livejournal.com
Does so!
Smitten means struck, same as hit.

We just generally interpret it as "love struck."

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-19 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahmichigan.livejournal.com
Was it that article that got you thinking about this? I thought it was really cool.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-19 08:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] o-lucky-man.livejournal.com
It does?

If I'm overlooking the obvious please let me know, but according to the OED, the definition of "bite" is "The act or action of cutting, piercing, or wounding, with the teeth" and and that of "bitten" is "Cut into, pierced, or wounded with the teeth". While "smite's" definition is of "A stroke or heavy blow with a weapon, the hand, etc., or the sound made by this" and "smitten's" is "That has been smit; beaten, struck". I don't see a huge analogical difference. They seem rather apposite to me, in fact.

One may, of course, use "smitten" as a verb without an object, "smitten by affection," for example, but that doesn't negate the other uses of the word, right?




(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-19 10:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] novapsyche.livejournal.com
Well, I guess it does. But yes, "smitten" generally these days means "love struck," whereas if I mean to smite you, it probably has nothing to do with love.

So, the analogy technically works. I defer to you and [livejournal.com profile] o_lucky_man.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-19 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] droid-1.livejournal.com
Smite is same as strike.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-19 11:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] novapsyche.livejournal.com
Yes. Never mind. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-20 01:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brendand.livejournal.com
Maybe I'm crazy, but it seems like smite and smitten are opposite. I always think of smite as a bad thing and being smitten as a good thing. While biting is fun but being bitten is annoying.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-21 02:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] novapsyche.livejournal.com
It wasn't the article, but the article does relate.

I think I'll have to make a copy of it for my own records.

Profile

novapsyche: Sailor Moon rising into bright beams (Default)
novapsyche

October 2014

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12 131415161718
192021 22 232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags