(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-19 07:57 pm (UTC)
For those who thought that the author of the article was a woman, does your reading of the article change now that you know otherwise?

In ways that do not change my conclusions. I look at it rather in the same way I look at Heinlein's Friday; I'm impressed that he nailed down the psychology that well. That said, with Heinlein, I have feminine backup (I know a few women who insist no male could get it that right, and thus Friday must have been ghostwritten), and with this, it could just be me looking through male eyes and seeing what I think is the correct psychology.

I could also be making assumptions because you, being female, posted it-- that you thus agreed with it, at least in part, and thus validated my view of the psychology of the writer as feminine in some essential way. But I'm reaching with that.

As I recall, there was one particular passage that said to me "this is a female author," rather than assuming it from the subject matter-- I'll have to go back and re-read to see if I can pick it out.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

novapsyche: Sailor Moon rising into bright beams (Default)
novapsyche

October 2014

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12 131415161718
192021 22 232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags